回复：那个把水龙头耗干的西班牙混蛋是谁？
原始发布页
打开来源页面查看 1 个交叉存档
默默失败的话会很难看。
引用 gavinandresen 于 2010 年 8 月 4 日 08:40:55 PM 的发言
1. 根据 IP 地址的第一个字节限制频率（在这个例子中是 79. 或 81.）。
绝对有必要。你考虑的频率是多少？归根结底，限制频率总比让它全部流光要好。
引用 gavinandresen 于 2010 年 8 月 4 日 08:40:55 PM 的发言
3. 根据 IP 地址反向 DNS 查询结果的最后两个域名限制频率（在这个例子中是 rima-tde.net）。
这或许会出人意料地有效。如果有效，就能让他们不至于触发频率限制，而频率限制则作为最后一道防线。
引用 gavinandresen 于 2010 年 8 月 4 日 08:40:55 PM 的发言
4. 将标准赠送金额改为 0.5 比特币（自从我启动水龙头以来，比特币的价值已经上涨了 10 倍）。
确实该调低了。
英文原文
展开英文原文
Silently failing would look bad.
Quote from: gavinandresen on August 04, 2010, 08:40:55 PM
1. Rate limit based on the first byte of the IP address (79. or 81. in this case).
Definitely needed. What rate are you thinking of? Ultimately, it's better to rate limit it than to let it all drain out.
Quote from: gavinandresen on August 04, 2010, 08:40:55 PM
3. Rate limit based on last two domains of reverse DNS lookup of the IP address (rima-tde.net in this case).
That might work surprisingly well. If it works, it keeps them from hitting the rate limit, but the rate limit is there as the last line of defence.
Quote from: gavinandresen on August 04, 2010, 08:40:55 PM
4. Make the standard amount given away 0.5 Bitcoins (Bitcoins have gone up 10 times in value since I started the Faucet).
Definitely time to lower it.