回复：0.00000001 BC 洪泛攻击
原始发布页
打开来源页面查看 1 个交叉存档
引用 Insti 于 2010 年 8 月 4 日 下午 02:58:31 的发言
这似乎弊大于利，因为它阻碍了像 bytemaster 所建议的那种微支付实现。
比特币目前不适合非常小额的微支付。如果没有聚合机制，它不适合按搜索次数或页面浏览次数付费之类的场景，也不适合需要支付少于 0.01 的场景。粉尘垃圾交易限制是有意尝试阻止这种过小微支付的第一次尝试。
比特币适用于比现有支付方式所能处理的更小额交易。小到足以涵盖你可能称为微支付范围上端的部分。但它并未声称适用于任意小额的微支付。
英文原文
展开英文原文
Quote from: Insti on August 04, 2010, 02:58:31 PM
It seems to do more harm than good because it prevents micropayment implementations such as the one bytemaster is suggesting.
Bitcoin isn't currently practical for very small micropayments. Not for things like pay per search or per page view without an aggregating mechanism, not things needing to pay less than 0.01. The dust spam limit is a first try at intentionally trying to prevent overly small micropayments like that.
Bitcoin is practical for smaller transactions than are practical with existing payment methods. Small enough to include what you might call the top of the micropayment range. But it doesn't claim to be practical for arbitrarily small micropayments.