回复：0.3.1 候选发布版，请测试
原始发布页
打开来源页面查看 1 个交叉存档
引用 RHorning 于 2010 年 7 月 15 日 10:29:28 PM 的发言
我看不到这两种情况中的任何一种发生，尽管它确实被放进了“Startup”文件夹。这也太有 Windows 95 那味儿了（开玩笑……微软把这事搞得一团糟，根本让人笑不出来）。出于很多原因，我建议采用注册表设置，其中包括大多数软件都把启动项放在那里这一事实，尽管我个人觉得启动文件夹更有吸引力，而且 Windows 上的大多数软件本该这样做。
两种方式都可以。Startup 文件夹的优点是，最终用户可以看见它；如果他们已经删掉了 Bitcoin 目录及其卸载程序，还可以通过普通界面（而不是 regedit）手动移除它。如果你手动删除，Bitcoin 不会没完没了地重新添加它。
OpenOffice 是另一个把链接放进 Startup 文件夹的软件例子。
英文原文
展开英文原文
Quote from: RHorning on July 15, 2010, 10:29:28 PM
I don't see either happening, although it did get put into the "Startup" folder. That is so Windows 95ish (just kidding..... Microsoft has so screwed this up that it isn't even funny). I would recommend the registry settings for a number of reasons including the fact that most software puts the startup in that location, even though I personally find the startup folder to be more attractive and how most software on Windows should behave.
It could go either way. The Startup folder has the advantage that the end user can see it and manually remove it with the regular UI (not regedit) if they already blew away the Bitcoin directory and its uninstaller. Bitcoin will not relentlessly keep re-adding it if you delete it manually.
OpenOffice is another example of something that puts its link in the Startup folder.