回复：BitDNS 与比特币的通用化
原始发布页
打开来源页面查看 1 个交叉存档
@dtvan：这 3 点都很棒。
- IP 记录不需要放在链上，只做注册商功能，不做 DNS。而且 CA 问题也解决了，漂亮。
- 选一个 TLD，.web +1。
- 到期机制和高额续期成本，非常重要。
引用自：joe，2010 年 12 月 11 日 10:53:58 AM
不过，现在进一步考虑之后，我支持在主网络中加入额外的 coinbase／跟踪系统。这样做是为了避免把 CPU 算力稀释到多个网络中。我们想要一个强大的网络，因此这个网络应该具备多种用途。
避免 CPU 算力碎片化已经不再是理由。独立的网络／链可以共享 CPU 算力，而不必共享太多其他东西。参见：http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg28696#msg28696 和 http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg28715#msg28715
英文原文
展开英文原文
@dtvan: all 3 excellent points.
- IP records don't need to be in the chain, just do registrar function not DNS. And CA problem solved, neat.
- Pick one TLD, .web +1.
- Expiration and significant renewal costs, very important.
Quote from: joe on December 11, 2010, 10:53:58 AM
However, thinking more about this now I support inclusion of additional coinbases / tracking systems in the main network. The reason for doing this is so as not to water down CPU power into multiple networks. We want one strong network, so the network should be versatile.
Avoiding CPU power fragmentation is no longer a reason. Independent networks/chains can share CPU power without sharing much else. See: http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg28696#msg28696 and http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg28715#msg28715