回复：改用 GPL
原始发布页
打开来源页面查看 1 个交叉存档
如果唯一的库是闭源的，那么就会有项目去做一个开源的。
如果唯一的库是 GPL 的，那么就会有项目去做一个非 GPL 的。
如果最好的库采用 MIT、Boost、new-BSD 或公有领域许可，那么我们就可以停止重复编写它。
我不怀疑 GPL 对操作系统而言是一种很好的许可证，尤其是因为它允许非 GPL 代码与操作系统交互。对于较小的项目，我认为对闭源接管的担忧被夸大了。
英文原文
展开英文原文
If the only library is closed source, then there's a project to make an open source one.
If the only library is GPL, then there's a project to make a non-GPL one.
If the best library is MIT, Boost, new-BSD or public domain, then we can stop re-writing it.
I don't question that GPL is a good license for operating systems, especially since non-GPL code is allowed to interface with the OS. For smaller projects, I think the fear of a closed-source takeover is overdone.