回复：引用你的 Hashcash 论文（比特币 v0.1 发布公告）
首次公开证据
打开首次公开证据查看 1 个交叉存档
- COPA v Wright Trial Evidence — Adam Back's Second Witness Statement (document C/21) included the complete five-email chain.
来源说明
Transcribed from screenshots embedded in Bitcoin Magazine's reproduction of the email chain Adam Back filed as evidence in COPA v. Wright (February 2024). Sender address changed from satoshi@anonymousspeech.com (used in the August 2008 chain) to satoshi@vistomail.com.
谢谢你为我的戴伟 b-money 论文和其他论文提供的参考线索。
我刚刚发布了我的论文的开源实现——比特币 v0.1。详情、下载和截图见 www.bitcoin.org
该系统的主要思路是生成一条基于哈希的工作量证明链，以创建多数共识自身存在的证明。用户通过向链贡献工作量证明来获得新币。
密码学邮件列表上曾讨论过这一设计。哈尔·芬尼作了很好的高层概述：
我想提的一点是，从许多方面看，比特币其实是两个相互独立的想法：一是解决 James 在这里列出的那类问题，即创建一个全局一致但去中心化的数据库；二是将其用于一个类似戴伟 b-money（论文中引用了它）的系统，不过它基于交易/币，而非基于账户。正如 James 所强调的，解决这种全局性、大规模去中心化数据库的问题，可以说是更困难的部分。将工作量证明用作实现这一目的的工具是一个新颖的想法，我认为非常值得进一步评估。
中本聪
英文原文
展开英文原文
Thanks for the pointers you gave to my Wei Dai's b-money paper and others.
I just released the open source implementation of my paper, Bitcoin v0.1. Details, download and screenshots are at www.bitcoin.org
The main idea of the system is the generation of a chain of hash based proof-of-work to create self extant proof of the majority consensus. Users get new coins by contributing proof-of-work to the chain.
There was a discussion of the design on the Cryptography mailing list. Hal Finney gave a good high-level overview:
One thing I might mention is that in many ways bitcoin is two independent ideas: a way of solving the kinds of problems James lists here, of creating a globally consistent but decentralized database; and then using it for a system similar to Wei Dai's b-money (which is referenced in the paper) but transaction/coin based rather than account based. Solving the global, massively decentralized database problem is arguably the harder part, as James emphasizes. The use of proof-of-work as a tool for this purpose is a novel idea well worth further review IMO.
Satoshi